SAN
FRANCISCO (AP) — Four female service members filed a lawsuit Tuesday
challenging the Pentagon's ban on women serving in combat, hoping the
move will add pressure to drop the policy just as officials are gauging
the effect that lifting the prohibition will have on morale.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in San
Francisco, is the second one this year over the 1994 rule that bars
women from being assigned to ground combat units, which are smaller and
considered more dangerous since they are often in battle for longer
periods.
The legal effort comes less than a year after the ban on
gays serving openly was lifted and as officials are surveying Marines
about whether women would be a distraction in ground combat units.
"I'm
trying to get rid of the ban with a sharp poke," said U.S. Army Staff
Sgt. Jennifer Hunt, who was among the plaintiffs in the latest lawsuit
and was injured in 2007 when her Humvee ran over an improvised explosive
device in Iraq.
Hunt and the other three women said the policy
unfairly blocks them from promotions and other advancements open to men
in combat. Three of the women are in the reserves. A fourth, Marine Corp
Lt. Colleen Farrell, leaves active duty this week.
Women comprise
14 percent of the 1.4 million active military personnel. The lawsuit
alleges that women are barred from 238,000 positions across the Armed
Forces.
At a Washington, D.C., news conference, Pentagon press
secretary George Little said the Defense Department was making strides
in allowing more women into combat. He said Defense Secretary Leon
Panetta has opened about 14,500 combat positions to women.
"And he
has directed the services to explore the possibility of opening
additional roles for women in the military," Little said. "His record is
very strong on this issue."
American Civil Liberties Union Ariela
Migdal, who represents the four women, said Panetta's actions weren't
enough. She called for an end to the combat ban. "These tweaks and minor
changes on the margins do a disservice to all the women who serve," she
said.
"It falls short," she said. "It is not enough."
Marine
Corps Capt. Zoe Bedell said she left active duty, in large part,
because of the combat exclusion policy. Bedell said she was frustrated
that her advancement in the Marines was blocked by her inability to
serve directly in combat units.
"The military is the last place where you are allowed to be discriminated against because of you gender," she said.
Bedell
said the blurred front lines of modern warfare, with suicide bombs and
sniper attacks, have put more and more women in combat situations.
More
than 144 female troops have been killed and more than 860 have been
wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan since the wars began, according to
Pentagon statistics.
Military leaders say they want to make sure
lifting gender-based barriers would not disrupt the cohesion of the
smaller combat ground units and military operations.
The Marine
Corps' top leader, Gen. James Amos, ordered a survey of 53,000 troops to
get their views, including whether they believe women in those units
would distract male Marines from doing their jobs. The results have not
been released yet.
The lawsuit alleges the ban violates
constitutional female service members' equal rights. "As a direct result
of this policy," the lawsuit states, "women — as a class and solely
because of their gender — are barred from entire career fields.
The lawsuit also alleges that women are already serving unofficially in combat units.
Air
National Guard Major Mary Jennings Hegar sustained shrapnel wounds in
2009 when she exchanged fire on the ground in Afghanistan after her
Medevac helicopter was shot down. Both she and Hunt received Purple
Heart medals for their injuries.
The lawsuit was assigned to U.S. District Judge Edward Chen, an appointee of President Barack Obama.
___
Associated Press writers Julie Watson in San Diego and Lolita C. Baldor in Washington, D.C., contributed to this report.
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press.