x

CBS News 8 - San Diego, CA News Station - KFMB Channel 8 | cbs8.com

Judge rules in favor of women suing GirlsDoPorn for lying about online videos

The judge ruled in favor of 22 women who were featured on a San Diego-based porn website.
Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

SAN DIEGO — A judge ruled Thursday in favor of 22 women who sued the owners and operators of San Diego-based pornographic website GirlsDoPorn.com, finding that the defendants lied to the plaintiffs by saying that videos in which they appeared would not be posted on the internet.   

The plaintiffs -- identified in court documents as "Jane Does 1 through 22" -- were awarded just under $9.5 million in compensatory damages (individual amounts differ for each victim) and $3.3 million in punitive damages, totaling $150,000 per plaintiff.   

San Diego County Superior Court Judge Kevin Enright found the defendants misrepresented claims that the videos would never appear online and were instead solely filmed for private clients living outside of the country, with the videos to be featured on DVDs.   

RELATED: Owners and employees of San Diego-based porn website charged with sex trafficking

Those claims were often bolstered by "reference women" who posed as models and provided "new recruits with false comfort that the experience is safe and enjoyable, and that the videos have never appeared online or been discovered by anyone in the models' lives," according to the judge's 187-page ruling. Once the women discovered their videos were posted online, Enright wrote that the website owners ignored requests to take the videos down and cut contact with the women altogether.

RELATED: Trial begins in suit brought by 22 women against San Diego-based porn website

In addition to awarding damages, Enright also ordered that any future written agreements drafted by the website's owners must feature clear and unequivocal language stating their videos will be posted on the internet; that written agreements must be sent to prospective models at least five days before any video shoots; and that the models' "explicit, unambiguous consent" must be obtained "in order to use her name or personal information for any purpose."

The defendants must also remove any videos or images featuring the plaintiffs from any websites they operate and cannot disseminate those materials any further. The court ordered the actresses hold all the rights, title and interest in the pictures and videos produced by GirlsDoPorn.

Defendants included GirlsDoPorn CEO Michael J. Pratt, actor Andre Garcia, videographer Matthew Wolfe and administrative assistant Valerie Moser, all of whom are facing federal sex trafficking charges, filed a few months after the onset of the civil trial. Wolfe and Garcia are currently in federal custody, while Pratt remains at-large. Moser, videographer Teddy Gyi and reference woman Amberlyn Dee Nored are out of custody on bond.

According to the San Diego Superior Court Public Affairs Office, the court found in favor of all plaintiffs on the following causes of action: Intentional misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, false promise, unlawful and fraudulent business practices, fraudulent transfer and declaratory relief.