SAN DIEGO — A group of female student-athletes filed a sex discrimination class action lawsuit Monday against San Diego State University that alleges the school has deprived female athletes of equal athletic financial aid in violation of Title IX.
The complaint filed in San Diego federal court alleges SDSU has not paid female varsity-student athletes equal financial aid in more than a decade and illegally denied female athletes more than $1.2 million in aid over the last two academic years.
The suit, which attorneys say is the first Title IX athletic financial aid damages case in the country, alleges that, per Title IX, schools must grant athletic financial aid in amounts proportional to male and female athletic participation rates.
When 57.22% of SDSU student-athletes were female in the 2020-21 year, the suit alleges they should have received 57.22% of the athletic financial aid awarded, but actually received 50.64%. The suit alleges this amounted to SDSU's 305 female varsity-student athletes getting more than $570,000 less than they should have.
Plaintiffs include former women's varsity rowing team member Madison Fisk, along with 16 past and current SDSU student-athletes.
"It is a sad day for the entire SDSU community that we have to sue the university to make it comply with Title IX and provide athletic financial aid equally to women and men," Fisk said. "Title IX has been the law for 50 years now and SDSU still isn't providing its female athletes with equal scholarship support. It's time for that to change."
Arthur H. Bryant, with Bailey & Glasser LLP, and lead counsel for the women, said, "The reports (SDSU) has filed with the federal government show that, since at least 2010, SDSU has been cheating its women athletes out of hundreds of thousands of dollars in equal athletic financial aid each year. This is illegal sex discrimination, plain and simple. It has to stop."
In a statement, San Diego State University said, "SDSU affirms its strong, long-standing commitment to supporting, training and providing competitive financial support to its female student-athletes. We have offered female student-athletes a choice of many and varied options in which to compete and be competitive -- this is a hallmark of SDSU's athletics programming."
“You can see that even in a case like this where the school is providing equal opportunities, the women are still being held back and they’re being held back now by not getting their fair share of financial aid,” said Jenna Rangel, a Partner with Haeggquist & Eck, one of the law firms representing the women.
The school's statement also said it "awards approximately 95% of all possible scholarships permitted under NCAA rules for both its men's and women's teams, with the remaining fraction explained by legitimate reasons within SDSU coaches' discretion. NCAA rules prohibit all schools, including SDSU, from giving unlimited athletic scholarships. To exceed these limits would make student-athletes ineligible to compete.
"We are disappointed with the incomplete picture presented by the plaintiffs' lawyers about the support for and successes of SDSU's female student-athletes. We have and will continue to put our students first. There are always opportunities to make additional improvements, and we will continue to prioritize equity, access and the full SDSU student-athlete experience."
Two of the plaintiffs, Natalie Figueroa and Greta Viss, say SDSU's explanation doesn’t explain why they didn’t receive more money. Title IX also requires that money be spent based on participation rates.
“They were still giving the 40% of male athletes, more money than the 60% women. So, no matter how they put it, it was wrong,” said Greta Viss, one of the plaintiffs.
“Above everything else, we want women and men athletes to be treated equally. So that’s our main goal and that’s what we want out of this case,” said Natalie Figueroa, another plaintiff in the case.
WATCH RELATED: SDSU victim spreads awareness after speaking out about date rape (Dec. 2021).